mek rabbit mab Search Results


94
Bioss anti phospho mek
Anti Phospho Mek, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti phospho mek/product/Bioss
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti phospho mek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mek ps218 ps222 antibodies
Anti Mek Ps218 Ps222 Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mek ps218 ps222 antibodies/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mek ps218 ps222 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit p mek
Rabbit P Mek, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit p mek/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit p mek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc t mapk kinase
Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the <t>B-raf/MAPK</t> pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
T Mapk Kinase, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/t mapk kinase/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
t mapk kinase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc total mek
Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the <t>B-raf/MAPK</t> pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Total Mek, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/total mek/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
total mek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mek rabbit antibody
Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the <t>B-raf/MAPK</t> pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Anti Mek Rabbit Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mek rabbit antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mek rabbit antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p mek
Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the <t>B-raf/MAPK</t> pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Anti P Mek, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p mek/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti p mek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mek
Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the <t>B-raf/MAPK</t> pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Mek, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mek/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho mek
Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the <t>B-raf/MAPK</t> pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Phospho Mek, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/phospho mek/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phospho mek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mek 1⁄2
SHOC2 is required for feedback relief ERK activation induced by MEKi’s. a SHOC2 deletion impairs ERK-reactivation after treatment with Selumetinib. Indicated cells were treated with 1 µM Selumetinib and lysates collected at indicated time points. b Quantification of P-BRAF/BRAF over time for cell lines shown in ( a ) relative to NT control. c Quantification of P-ERK/ERK over time for cell lines shown in ( a ) relative to NT control. d – f SHOC2 deletion impairs <t>MEK,</t> but not PanRAF induced ERK-reactivation. A549 and A427 cells were pre-treated for <t>12</t> h with either 1 µM Selumetinib ( d ) / 100 nM Trametinib ( e ) / or 2.5 µM LY3009120 ( f ). Cells were either lysed at this point (NT - Non Treated, NW - Non washed) or the inhibitor was washed-out for the indicated time points before lysate collection. Lysates were used to perform RAS-RBD pull downs and the additional cell lysate probed with indicated antibodies. g H520 cells or h H522 cells, which have no known driver mutations in the ERK pathway show a reduced dependency on SHOC2 for MEKi-induced ERK-reactivation. Parental or SHOC2 KO H520/H522 cells were treated as ( e )
Mek 1⁄2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mek 1⁄2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mek 1⁄2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the B-raf/MAPK pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Journal: Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie

Article Title: β-HB treatment reverses sorafenib resistance by shifting glycolysis-lactate metabolism in HCC.

doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115293

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 5. β-HB treatment reversed sorafenib resistance and enhanced regorafenib sensitivity by inhibiting the B-raf/MAPK pathway in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR cells. (A) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with sorafenib (0 and 10 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, and 5 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (B) Huh7-SR and SK-Hep-1-SR cells were treated with regorafenib (0 and 5 μM) and β-HB (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM) for 48 h, and cell viability was then analyzed using an MTT assay. (C) Western blotting was conducted to analyze the protein expression of phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-MAPK-related signaling cascades; α-tubulin was used as an internal control. (D) Western blot images from Fig. 4 C were quantified using ImageJ software. (E) Representative contour plots of apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI. (F) Apoptosis rates were assessed in dose-dependent regorafenib with or without β-HB treatment in Huh7-SR and Sk-Hep-1-SR with Annexin V/PI staining. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01; * ** p < 0.001 vs. 0 mM β-HB cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used in the experiments: HMGCS2 (1:1000, #ab137043, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), hexokinase I (1:1000, #2024, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), hexokinase II (1:1000, #2867, Cell Signaling), phosphofructokinase (1:1000, #8164, Cell Signaling), LDHA (1:1000, #3582, Cell Signaling), PDH (1:1000, #3205, Cell Signaling), IDH (1:1000, #8137, Cell Signaling), phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-B-raf (1:1000, #2696 and #9433, Cell Signaling), p- and t-MAPK kinase (MEK; 1:1000, #2338 and #9122, Cell Signaling), ERK (1:1000, #9101 and #4695, Cell Signaling), β-catenin (1:1000, #8480, Cell Signaling), ZO-1 (1:1000, #8193, Cell Signaling), Vimentin (1:1000, #5741, Cell Signaling), N-cadherin (1:1000, #13116, Cell Signaling) and antiα-tubulin (1:5000 dilution, #T9026, Sigma-Aldrich).

Techniques: MTT Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Software, Flow Cytometry, Staining

SHOC2 is required for feedback relief ERK activation induced by MEKi’s. a SHOC2 deletion impairs ERK-reactivation after treatment with Selumetinib. Indicated cells were treated with 1 µM Selumetinib and lysates collected at indicated time points. b Quantification of P-BRAF/BRAF over time for cell lines shown in ( a ) relative to NT control. c Quantification of P-ERK/ERK over time for cell lines shown in ( a ) relative to NT control. d – f SHOC2 deletion impairs MEK, but not PanRAF induced ERK-reactivation. A549 and A427 cells were pre-treated for 12 h with either 1 µM Selumetinib ( d ) / 100 nM Trametinib ( e ) / or 2.5 µM LY3009120 ( f ). Cells were either lysed at this point (NT - Non Treated, NW - Non washed) or the inhibitor was washed-out for the indicated time points before lysate collection. Lysates were used to perform RAS-RBD pull downs and the additional cell lysate probed with indicated antibodies. g H520 cells or h H522 cells, which have no known driver mutations in the ERK pathway show a reduced dependency on SHOC2 for MEKi-induced ERK-reactivation. Parental or SHOC2 KO H520/H522 cells were treated as ( e )

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: SHOC2 phosphatase-dependent RAF dimerization mediates resistance to MEK inhibition in RAS-mutant cancers

doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10367-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: SHOC2 is required for feedback relief ERK activation induced by MEKi’s. a SHOC2 deletion impairs ERK-reactivation after treatment with Selumetinib. Indicated cells were treated with 1 µM Selumetinib and lysates collected at indicated time points. b Quantification of P-BRAF/BRAF over time for cell lines shown in ( a ) relative to NT control. c Quantification of P-ERK/ERK over time for cell lines shown in ( a ) relative to NT control. d – f SHOC2 deletion impairs MEK, but not PanRAF induced ERK-reactivation. A549 and A427 cells were pre-treated for 12 h with either 1 µM Selumetinib ( d ) / 100 nM Trametinib ( e ) / or 2.5 µM LY3009120 ( f ). Cells were either lysed at this point (NT - Non Treated, NW - Non washed) or the inhibitor was washed-out for the indicated time points before lysate collection. Lysates were used to perform RAS-RBD pull downs and the additional cell lysate probed with indicated antibodies. g H520 cells or h H522 cells, which have no known driver mutations in the ERK pathway show a reduced dependency on SHOC2 for MEKi-induced ERK-reactivation. Parental or SHOC2 KO H520/H522 cells were treated as ( e )

Article Snippet: MEK 1⁄2 , Cell Signaling Technology , 4694 , Rabbit , 1:1000.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Control

SHOC2 is required for RAF dimerization induced by MEKi’s. a SHOC2 depletion abrogates MEKi-induced RAF dimerization and impairs ERK pathway reactivation after MEKi withdrawal. shSCR of shSHOC2 H358 cells were pre-treated with 1 µM Selumetinib for 12 h, before the inhibitor was washed-out at indicated time points and lysates used to perform endogenous RAF IPs. (NT - Non Treated, NW - Non washed). Con = IgG control IP. b As ( a ) using A549 and HCC4006 cells with a single wash-out time point of 30 min. c SHOC2 is required for MEK but not PanRAFi-induced RAF dimerization. Parental and SHOC2 KO H358 cells were pre-treated with 1 µM Selumetinib, 100 nM Trametinib 2.5 μM LY3009120 and subject to endogenous RAF IPs as ( a ). d SHOC2 is required for ERK inhibitor induced RAF dimerization. As ( c ), H358 cells were treated with 1 μM Selumetinib and 2 μM LY3214996. e B & C but not ARAF knockdown partially diminish MEKi induced signalling rebound and ERK reactivation. H358 cells transfected with indicated siRNAs were treated 3 days later with 1 µM Selumetinib for 12 h before the inhibitor was washed-out for 30 min. (NT - Non Treated, NW - Non washed). f Quantification of P-ERK and P-T380 RSK in ( e ). g B & C, but not ARAF knockdown partially sensitise H358 cells to Selumetinib. Viability curves for Selumetinib of H358 cells transfected with siRNAs as in ( e ). h Schematic to illustrate the requirement of the SHOC2 phosphatase complex for feedback relief ERK-activation on MEKi treatment. ERK activity in RAS-mutant cells is maintained at steady state by negative feedbacks at multiple levels including RTK and RAF pathway nodes. MEKi treatment leads to feedback relief ERK-pathway activation that is both dependent upon RAS-GTP and SHOC2 phosphatase-dependent ‘S259’ dephosphorylation for RAF dimerization. Following inhibitor withdrawal, release of this ‘primed’ P-MEK (phosphorylated but unable to activate ERK when inhibitor-bound) generates a wave of ERK phosphorylation that is dampened by negative feedbacks. Even in the presence of mutant RAS in SHOC2 KO cells MEKi induced feedback relief RAF dimerization is prevented, leading to reduced P-MEK rebound and more potent and durable ERK inhibition

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: SHOC2 phosphatase-dependent RAF dimerization mediates resistance to MEK inhibition in RAS-mutant cancers

doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10367-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: SHOC2 is required for RAF dimerization induced by MEKi’s. a SHOC2 depletion abrogates MEKi-induced RAF dimerization and impairs ERK pathway reactivation after MEKi withdrawal. shSCR of shSHOC2 H358 cells were pre-treated with 1 µM Selumetinib for 12 h, before the inhibitor was washed-out at indicated time points and lysates used to perform endogenous RAF IPs. (NT - Non Treated, NW - Non washed). Con = IgG control IP. b As ( a ) using A549 and HCC4006 cells with a single wash-out time point of 30 min. c SHOC2 is required for MEK but not PanRAFi-induced RAF dimerization. Parental and SHOC2 KO H358 cells were pre-treated with 1 µM Selumetinib, 100 nM Trametinib 2.5 μM LY3009120 and subject to endogenous RAF IPs as ( a ). d SHOC2 is required for ERK inhibitor induced RAF dimerization. As ( c ), H358 cells were treated with 1 μM Selumetinib and 2 μM LY3214996. e B & C but not ARAF knockdown partially diminish MEKi induced signalling rebound and ERK reactivation. H358 cells transfected with indicated siRNAs were treated 3 days later with 1 µM Selumetinib for 12 h before the inhibitor was washed-out for 30 min. (NT - Non Treated, NW - Non washed). f Quantification of P-ERK and P-T380 RSK in ( e ). g B & C, but not ARAF knockdown partially sensitise H358 cells to Selumetinib. Viability curves for Selumetinib of H358 cells transfected with siRNAs as in ( e ). h Schematic to illustrate the requirement of the SHOC2 phosphatase complex for feedback relief ERK-activation on MEKi treatment. ERK activity in RAS-mutant cells is maintained at steady state by negative feedbacks at multiple levels including RTK and RAF pathway nodes. MEKi treatment leads to feedback relief ERK-pathway activation that is both dependent upon RAS-GTP and SHOC2 phosphatase-dependent ‘S259’ dephosphorylation for RAF dimerization. Following inhibitor withdrawal, release of this ‘primed’ P-MEK (phosphorylated but unable to activate ERK when inhibitor-bound) generates a wave of ERK phosphorylation that is dampened by negative feedbacks. Even in the presence of mutant RAS in SHOC2 KO cells MEKi induced feedback relief RAF dimerization is prevented, leading to reduced P-MEK rebound and more potent and durable ERK inhibition

Article Snippet: MEK 1⁄2 , Cell Signaling Technology , 4694 , Rabbit , 1:1000.

Techniques: Control, Knockdown, Transfection, Activation Assay, Activity Assay, Mutagenesis, De-Phosphorylation Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Inhibition